Posts tagged Corrective Action

5 articles

More in CAPA, 8D, and Corrective Action
CAPA Closure Criteria: The Six Things That Have to Be True Before \"Closed\" Means Anything
CAPA, 8D, and Corrective Action
CAPA8D

CAPA Closure Criteria: The Six Things That Have to Be True Before \"Closed\" Means Anything

A CAPA marked closed is a claim, not a fact. Containment recorded, corrective action recorded as a system change, effectiveness criteria written as a record instead of a checkbox, verification marked verified against evidence, an independent reviewer, and a recurrence window sized to the part, not the calendar. What the platform enforces for each, in practitioners' own words, and where the automatic recurrence chase is real but scoped.

September 16, 20269 min read
PFMEA Rescoring: How Do You Prove a Corrective Action Actually Lowered Risk?
FMEA and Risk
PFMEAFMEA Software

PFMEA Rescoring: How Do You Prove a Corrective Action Actually Lowered Risk?

A PFMEA gets built, signed off, and filed. Six months later a corrective action closes against one of its failure modes, and nobody updates the RPN. Here is how a rescore workflow locks severity, recalculates occurrence and detection, and produces a before and after risk number a PFMEA spreadsheet cannot generate on its own.

August 27, 20269 min read
CAPA Effectiveness Metrics: The KPIs That Tell You Corrective Action Is Working
CAPA, 8D, and Corrective Action
CAPAMetrics

CAPA Effectiveness Metrics: The KPIs That Tell You Corrective Action Is Working

Closing CAPAs on time tells you nothing about whether problems stop coming back. This is the small set of CAPA effectiveness metrics that does: recurrence rate, repeat findings, aging and cycle time, reopen rate, and escape rate, how to define each one so it cannot be gamed, and how to wire them into management review under ISO 9001 clause 9.3.2 and IATF 16949 clause 9.3.2.1.

May 31, 202610 min read
CAPA Effectiveness Verification: How to Prove a Corrective Action Actually Worked
CAPA, 8D, and Corrective Action
CAPAEffectiveness Verification

CAPA Effectiveness Verification: How to Prove a Corrective Action Actually Worked

Most CAPAs close before anyone confirms the fix held. This is what corrective action effectiveness verification requires under ISO 9001 and IATF 16949 clause 10.2.1, how to set objective acceptance criteria, how long to keep the CAPA open, and the audit findings that catch a verification that was a signature instead of a number.

May 27, 202611 min read
8D vs CAPA: What's the Difference and When to Use Each
CAPA, 8D, and Corrective Action
8DCAPA

8D vs CAPA: What's the Difference and When to Use Each

8D and CAPA are not the same thing. 8D is a problem-solving methodology. CAPA is a quality system requirement under IATF 16949. Conflating them causes audit findings and customer rejections.

April 19, 202610 min read