Quality engineering software for manufacturers

The paperwork, handled carefully. The decisions stay with your engineers.

QualityEngineer.ai keeps your PPAP, CAPA, and supplier quality work in one connected record, with APQP project plans alongside. It drafts documents, checks that they link to each other, and shows you what is missing. Your team reviews and signs.

No card required. Encrypted at rest and in transit.

Control Plan CP-2210 / Production

Wheel hub WH-2210, part revision B

Built from

PFMEA FM-2210

OpCharacteristicSpecification
20Bearing bore diameterSC62.000 +0.030 / 0 mm
20Bore roundness0.008 mm
30Stud press forceCC18 to 24 kN
FLAGNo MSA study is attached for gauge G-117.Op 20, bearing bore diameter.

Drafted by

QualityEngineer.ai

Approved by

Not signed

Illustrative example. The plan records the PFMEA it was built from. The flag is the advisory the PPAP package shows on Element 8 when a characteristic’s gauge has no MSA study attached. The approval line stays empty until an engineer signs.

How we work

Software that helps the humans, not replaces them.

01

It prepares. A person signs.

The software drafts, checks, and flags. Signing a warrant or a document, approving a revision, and accepting or rejecting a PPAP element are done by a person, never by the software.

02

Each document records what it was built from.

A Control Plan records the PFMEA it was built from, the PFMEA records its Process Flow, and every document in a run is tied to the same part revision. The document page shows what each one came from and what uses it, so when an auditor asks, you can show them.

03

Built to the standards you are audited against.

The 18 PPAP elements and five submission levels, capability limits, and Gauge R&R acceptance follow the AIAG manuals. Each PPAP element carries its IATF 16949 clauses and VDA 6.3 questions, and aerospace teams can export AS9102 first article forms.

One connected record

Read the drawing once. Each document is drafted from it.

The bearing bore on the drawing has to match the control plan and the inspection plan. The characteristics read from the drawing, with their SC and CC marks, are handed to every draft in the run: Process Flow, PFMEA, Control Plan, and Inspection Plan. The Control Plan row carries the SC or CC mark.

Sources
Each document records the document it was built from.
Process facts
When a Control Plan, PFMEA, or Inspection Plan relies on a process fact, the rows that use it are marked declared, because you told us, or assumed, our default that nobody has confirmed. One click confirms or corrects it, and every later document for your organization uses your answer.
Completeness
For each part’s PPAP package, a check that uses no AI model reports what share of the required links between documents are present, such as a control plan line and a capability study for every SC and CC characteristic, and lists the ones that are missing. It is reported apart from the quality score, never averaged into it.
  1. 01DrawingWH-2210, rev BPart revision B
    Balloon 7Bearing bore diameterSC, special characteristicDesign requirementSpecification: 62.000 +0.030 / 0 mm
  2. 02Process FlowPF-2210Linked through part revision B
    Op 20Finish boreOperation
  3. 03PFMEAFM-2210Source: Process Flow PF-2210
    Op 20Failure mode: bore oversizeFinish bore
  4. 04Control PlanCP-2210Source: PFMEA FM-2210
    Op 20Bearing bore diameterSC, special characteristicCMM, 1 per 50Specification: 62.000 +0.030 / 0 mm
  5. 05Inspection PlanIP-2210Source: Control Plan CP-2210
    Item 3Bearing bore diameterOp 20, CMM, 1 per 50Specification: 62.000 +0.030 / 0 mm
Illustrative example. Every document is generated for the same part revision, and each one after the Process Flow records the document it was built from. The drawing is linked through the part revision, not recorded as a source. The characteristic and its specification appear on the drawing, the Control Plan and the Inspection Plan. The Process Flow and PFMEA carry the operation and its failure mode. The package graph matches each control plan line back to the drawing characteristic by name and lists any it cannot match.

Findings from an 8D, 5-Why, or Fishbone arrive as proposed changes to the Control Plan, PFMEA, or Inspection Plan you choose. You review each change row by row, and the document does not change until an engineer applies the approved change as a new revision, which records the investigation as its source.

Standards and methods

Workflows follow the AIAG manuals and VDA 6.3 in automotive, AS9100 and AS9102 first article inspection in aerospace, and ISO 9001 and ANSI/ASQ Z1.4 sampling in general manufacturing.

  • IATF 16949
  • AS9100
  • AS9102
  • ISO 9001
  • AIAG PPAP
  • APQP
  • PFMEA
  • MSA
  • SPC
  • VDA 6.3
  • ANSI/ASQ Z1.4

Who it is for

  • Supplier quality engineers
  • Quality managers and directors
  • APQP and launch program managers
  • Manufacturing and process engineers
  • Tier 1, Tier 2, and contract manufacturers

Who builds it

“The paperwork was never the hard part of the job. The hard part was doing all of it while also trying to engineer better products.”

QualityEngineer.ai was started in 2025 by Daniel and Pat Crouse after years in manufacturing quality: writing PPAPs by hand, chasing supplier corrective actions, and losing weeks to audit prep.

About the companyHow we protect your dataHow our CFO agent’s numbers are verified

Try it on a real part.

Upload a drawing or a PPAP package and see what it finds. The trial runs 30 days, needs no card, and your data is kept separate from every other organization’s.